| | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Core i5-3317U


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the i5-3317U gets 45.2 k points.

Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
306a9
Core
Lynnfield
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
95 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2009
Jun 2012

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
1745
2503 (43.43%)
Test#2 (FP)
3951
7176 (81.61%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2295
3186 (38.84%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2656
3409 (28.38%)
TOTAL
10647
16274 (52.85%)

Multithread

X3430

i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
6806
4932 (-27.54%)
Test#2 (FP)
15370
15721 (2.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8896
7533 (-15.33%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4421
4209 (-4.79%)
TOTAL
35493
32395 (-8.73%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
6407
8384 (30.86%)
Test#2 (FP)
4275
7758 (81.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2384
3331 (39.70%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2672
3410 (27.60%)
TOTAL
15738
22882 (45.39%)

Multithread

X3430

i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
25195
16564 (-34.26%)
Test#2 (FP)
16764
16792 (0.16%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9326
7848 (-15.85%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4372
4022 (-8.01%)
TOTAL
55657
45226 (-18.74%)

Performance/W
X3430
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
974 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
237 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
2660 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
2984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
1281 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
8801 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8