| | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Core i5-2400


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the i5-2400 gets 58.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.7 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
206a7
Core
Lynnfield
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2009
January 2011

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
1745
2722 (55.98%)
Test#2 (FP)
3951
7601 (92.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2295
3983 (73.55%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2656
4474 (68.47%)
TOTAL
10647
18779 (76.39%)

Multithread

X3430

i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
6806
10366 (52.29%)
Test#2 (FP)
15370
28836 (87.61%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8896
15076 (69.47%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4421
4668 (5.59%)
TOTAL
35493
58945 (66.08%)

Performance/W
X3430
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
72 points/W
109 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
162 points/W
304 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94 points/W
159 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
374 points/W
620 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
623 points/GHz
801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/GHz
2236 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
820 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
948 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
TOTAL
3802 points/GHz
5523 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8