Xeon X3430 vs Core i3-6100T
Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.4 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.4 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
506e3
Core
Lynnfield
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2009
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
15.74k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.66k points
105.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.75k
3.14k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
12.26k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.29k
3.94k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
2.21k (x0.83)
TOTAL
10.65k
21.55k (x2.02)
Multithread
X3430
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.81k
6.52k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
15.37k
30.61k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
10.59k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.42k
2.77k (x0.63)
TOTAL
35.49k
50.49k (x1.42)
Performance/W
X3430
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
72 points/W
186 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
162 points/W
875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94 points/W
302 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
374 points/W
1442 points/W
Performance/GHz
X3430
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
623 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/GHz
3832 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
820 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
948 points/GHz
690 points/GHz
TOTAL
3802 points/GHz
6733 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4