| | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Celeron J3455


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.

Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.2 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
506c9
Core
Lynnfield
Apollo Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2009
August 2016

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
6407
6023 (-5.99%)
Test#2 (FP)
4275
3490 (-18.36%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2384
2006 (-15.86%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2672
1465 (-45.17%)
TOTAL
15738
12984 (-17.50%)

Multithread

X3430

J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
25195
23697 (-5.95%)
Test#2 (FP)
16764
13752 (-17.97%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9326
7801 (-16.35%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4372
2087 (-52.27%)
TOTAL
55657
47337 (-14.95%)

Performance/W
X3430
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
4734 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8