| | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E2160 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.

Summarizing, the X3430 is 4.3 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
6f2
Core
Lynnfield
Allendale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2009
Jun 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1745
1812 (3.80%)
Test#2 (FP)
3951
1811 (-54.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2295
1794 (-21.81%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2656
1161 (-56.28%)
TOTAL
10647
6578 (-38.21%)

Multithread

X3430

E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
6806
3619 (-46.83%)
Test#2 (FP)
15370
3610 (-76.51%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8896
3593 (-59.62%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4421
1189 (-73.10%)
TOTAL
35493
12011 (-66.16%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
6407
2080 (-67.54%)
Test#2 (FP)
4275
1878 (-56.07%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2384
1889 (-20.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2672
1158 (-56.67%)
TOTAL
15738
7004 (-55.49%)

Multithread

X3430

E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
25195
4158 (-83.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
16764
3739 (-77.69%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9326
3783 (-59.44%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4372
1189 (-72.80%)
TOTAL
55657
12869 (-76.88%)

Performance/W
X3430
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
64 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
58 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
198 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
643 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
3891 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8