| | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.2 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
810f10
Core
Lynnfield
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2009
January 2018

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1745
2626 (50.46%)
Test#2 (FP)
3951
7841 (98.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2295
3626 (57.99%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2656
2928 (10.27%)
TOTAL
10647
17021 (59.87%)

Multithread

X3430

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6806
5767 (-15.28%)
Test#2 (FP)
15370
24153 (57.14%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8896
9277 (4.28%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4421
2829 (-36.00%)
TOTAL
35493
42025 (18.40%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6407
11671 (82.17%)
Test#2 (FP)
4275
14019 (227.96%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2384
4526 (89.84%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2672
2927 (9.54%)
TOTAL
15738
33144 (110.60%)

Multithread

X3430

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25195
20487 (-18.68%)
Test#2 (FP)
16764
31317 (86.81%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9326
9991 (7.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4372
3030 (-30.71%)
TOTAL
55657
64825 (16.47%)

Performance/W
X3430
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
4322 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8