Xeon X3430 vs Core i5-11400T
Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400T is 1.9 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400T is 1.9 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
a0671
Core
Lynnfield
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2009
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
15.74k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.66k points
67.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.75k
3.51k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
14.2k (x3.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.29k
7.63k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
6.06k (x2.28)
TOTAL
10.65k
31.39k (x2.95)
Multithread
X3430
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.81k
7.4k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
15.37k
31.37k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
18.11k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.42k
10.23k (x2.31)
TOTAL
35.49k
67.1k (x1.89)
Performance/W
X3430
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
72 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
162 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
374 points/W
1917 points/W
Performance/GHz
X3430
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
623 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
820 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
948 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
3802 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4