| | | | | | |

Xeon W3550 vs E5-4640


Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the E5-4640 gets 581.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 7.9 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
206d7
Core
Bloomfield
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4 /4
8 /16
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2009
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
610.16k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
1.66k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
5.26k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
2.13k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
2.53k (x0.82)
TOTAL
13.92k
11.58k (x0.83)

Multithread

W3550

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
77.64k (x8.88)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
212.2k (x10.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
113.11k (x9.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
7.54k (x1.22)
TOTAL
47.09k
410.48k (x8.72)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
6.19k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
5.89k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
2.11k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
2.51k (x0.81)
TOTAL
20.24k
16.7k (x0.83)

Multithread

W3550

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
244.88k (x7.53)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
215.35k (x9.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
114.64k (x8.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
6.76k (x1.08)
TOTAL
73.21k
581.63k (x7.94)

Performance/W
W3550
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
2267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
1207 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
6122 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3550
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
2210 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
2105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
5966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4