| | | | | | |

Xeon W3550 vs E5-2670 v3


Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 4.5 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
306f2
Core
Bloomfield
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4 /4
12/24
TDP
130 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2009
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
3.52k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
8.68k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
2.83k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.13k (x1.01)
TOTAL
13.92k
18.17k (x1.31)

Multithread

W3550

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
32.7k (x3.74)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
105.18k (x5.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
35.18k (x2.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
9.54k (x1.54)
TOTAL
47.09k
182.59k (x3.88)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
11.08k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
9.57k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.18k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
3.28k (x1.07)
TOTAL
20.24k
27.11k (x1.34)

Multithread

W3550

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
139.07k (x4.28)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
133.47k (x6.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
46.6k (x3.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
6.65k (x1.06)
TOTAL
73.21k
325.78k (x4.45)

Performance/W
W3550
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
1159 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
1112 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
2715 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3550
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
1027 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
1059 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
8745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4