Xeon W3550 vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 47.1 k points while the 2600 gets 177.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 3.8 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 47.1 k points while the 2600 gets 177.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 3.8 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
800f82
Core
Bloomfield
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /4
6/12
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2009
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
291.53k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
3.41k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
15.96k (x3.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
4.69k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
17.42k (x5.63)
TOTAL
13.92k
41.47k (x2.98)
Multithread
W3550
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
20.88k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
110.37k (x5.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
39.25k (x3.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
6.66k (x1.08)
TOTAL
47.09k
177.16k (x3.76)
Performance/W
W3550
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
67 points/W
321 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
152 points/W
1698 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95 points/W
604 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
362 points/W
2726 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3550
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
690 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1564 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
928 points/GHz
4466 points/GHz
TOTAL
4175 points/GHz
10633 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4