| | | | | | |

Xeon W3550 vs Core i5-1235U


Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i5-1235U gets 288.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 3.9 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
906a4
Core
Bloomfield
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4 /4
10/12
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2009
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
7.33k (x3.19)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
18.27k (x3.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
12.8k (x3.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
13.2k (x4.27)
TOTAL
13.92k
51.61k (x3.71)

Multithread

W3550

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
29.24k (x3.34)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
83.32k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
54.53k (x4.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
4.99k (x0.81)
TOTAL
47.09k
172.07k (x3.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
23.53k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
23.51k (x4.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
14.71k (x4.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
13.24k (x4.3)
TOTAL
20.24k
74.99k (x3.7)

Multithread

W3550

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
106.07k (x3.26)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
115.88k (x5.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
60.53k (x4.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
5.88k (x0.94)
TOTAL
73.21k
288.36k (x3.94)

Performance/W
W3550
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
7072 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
7725 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
4035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
392 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
19224 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3550
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
5347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
3344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
3009 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
17044 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4