Xeon W3530 vs Core i5-4210U
Description
The W3530 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i5-4210U gets 45.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i5-4210U gets 45.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
40651
Core
Bloomfield
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2010
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
18.2k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
72.77k points
57.58k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3530
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
9.26k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
4.93k
8.2k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
3.57k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.92k (x1.07)
TOTAL
18.2k
23.95k (x1.32)
Multithread
W3530
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.33k
17.53k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
17.56k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.78k
7.65k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
2.49k (x0.97)
TOTAL
72.77k
45.22k (x0.62)
Performance/W
W3530
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
1169 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
1171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
510 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
560 points/W
3015 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3530
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2450 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1608 points/GHz
3038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1322 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
1083 points/GHz
TOTAL
5935 points/GHz
8872 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4