Xeon W3520 vs E3-1225
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the E3-1225 gets 69 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the E3-1225 gets 69 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
206a7
Core
Nehalem-WS
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
April 2011
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
23.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
68.97k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
9.65k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
7.76k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
3.95k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
2.57k (x0.91)
TOTAL
17.96k
23.94k (x1.33)
Multithread
W3520
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
30.52k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
24.1k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
12.01k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
2.34k (x0.37)
TOTAL
73.16k
68.97k (x0.94)
Performance/W
W3520
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
321 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
126 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
726 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
2839 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
2283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1162 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
757 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
7041 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4