Xeon W3520 vs Pentium 4417U
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.8 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.8 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
806ea
Core
Nehalem-WS
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2009
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
41.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
7.94k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
11.35k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
2.39k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
2.8k (x0.99)
TOTAL
17.96k
24.49k (x1.36)
Multithread
W3520
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
13.1k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
21.1k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
4.49k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
2.46k (x0.39)
TOTAL
73.16k
41.15k (x0.56)
Performance/W
W3520
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
2743 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4