Xeon W3520 vs Celeron N4120
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.6 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.6 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
706a8
Core
Nehalem-WS
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
130 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2009
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
5.94k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
7.51k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
2.78k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
2.67k (x0.95)
TOTAL
17.96k
18.9k (x1.05)
Multithread
W3520
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
15.02k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
19.77k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
7.71k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
3.67k (x0.58)
TOTAL
73.16k
46.17k (x0.63)
Performance/W
W3520
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4