Xeon W3520 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
100fa0
Core
Nehalem-WS
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/6
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
5.17k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
5.33k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
2.76k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
3.51k (x1.25)
TOTAL
17.96k
16.77k (x0.93)
Multithread
W3520
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
29.82k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
30.79k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
15.88k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
3.69k (x0.59)
TOTAL
73.16k
80.19k (x1.1)
Performance/W
W3520
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4