Xeon W3520 vs Core i5-12500H
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i5-12500H gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.7 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i5-12500H gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.7 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
906a3
Core
Nehalem-WS
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4 /8
12/16
TDP
130 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2009
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
225.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
21.93k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
18.79k (x3.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
10.5k (x3.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
8.11k (x2.88)
TOTAL
17.96k
59.33k (x3.3)
Multithread
W3520
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
61.07k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
86.08k (x3.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
41.08k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
6.02k (x0.96)
TOTAL
73.16k
194.25k (x2.66)
Performance/W
W3520
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
1357 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
1913 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
913 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
4317 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
4873 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
2334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1802 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
13184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4