| | | | | | |

Xeon L5430 vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The L5430 is based on Core architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.6 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
806ec
Core
Harpertown
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket 771
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
50 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2008
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
15.62k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.64k points
106.58k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L5430
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.09k
14.3k (x4.62)
Test#2 (FP)
6.86k
20.09k (x2.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.66k
5.23k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
4.24k (x1.41)
TOTAL
15.62k
43.87k (x2.81)

Multithread

L5430

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
25.51k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
27.27k
41.33k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.41k
10.81k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.57k
3.21k (x2.05)
TOTAL
51.64k
80.85k (x1.57)

Performance/W
L5430
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
1700 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
545 points/W
2755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
1033 points/W
5390 points/W

Performance/GHz
L5430
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2573 points/GHz
4901 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1128 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
5858 points/GHz
10699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4