Xeon L5430 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The L5430 is based on Core architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the 2400G gets 183 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.5 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the 2400G gets 183 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.5 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
810f10
Core
Harpertown
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket 771
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
50 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2008
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
15.62k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.64k points
198.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L5430
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.09k
13.95k (x4.51)
Test#2 (FP)
6.86k
20.7k (x3.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.66k
5.33k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
3.03k (x1.01)
TOTAL
15.62k
43.01k (x2.75)
Multithread
L5430
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
58.56k (x4.72)
Test#2 (FP)
27.27k
92.95k (x3.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.41k
28.55k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.57k
2.98k (x1.9)
TOTAL
51.64k
183.04k (x3.54)
Performance/W
L5430
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
545 points/W
1430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
439 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
1033 points/W
2816 points/W
Performance/GHz
L5430
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
3577 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2573 points/GHz
5308 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1128 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
TOTAL
5858 points/GHz
11028 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4