| | | | | | |

Xeon E5645 vs Core i3-6100


Description
The E5645 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 77 k points while the i3-6100 gets 91.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.2 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206c2
506e3
Core
Westmere-EP
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6 /6
2/2
TDP
80 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2010
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
15.64k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.96k points
112.28k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5645
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
3.81k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
3.91k
15.65k (x4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.52k
5.14k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
4.28k (x1.77)
TOTAL
10.64k
28.89k (x2.72)

Multithread

E5645

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
9.67k
7.75k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
37.33k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.31k
12.13k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.56k (x0.94)
TOTAL
50.7k
60.77k (x1.2)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5645
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
6.47k
13.76k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
4.4k
19.96k (x4.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.43k
5.44k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
4.4k (x1.89)
TOTAL
15.64k
43.55k (x2.79)

Multithread

E5645

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
34.43k
28.99k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
24.23k
45.75k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.48k
12.72k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.68k (x0.96)
TOTAL
76.96k
91.14k (x1.18)

Performance/W
E5645
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
430 points/W
568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
303 points/W
897 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
181 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
1787 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5645
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2311 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1573 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
867 points/GHz
1469 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
833 points/GHz
1189 points/GHz
TOTAL
5584 points/GHz
11770 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4