| | | | | | |

Xeon E5645 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The E5645 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 77 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.3 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206c2
806c1
Core
Westmere-EP
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
6 /6
2/4
TDP
80 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2010
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
15.64k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.96k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5645
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
3.75k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
3.91k
17.22k (x4.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.52k
9.79k (x3.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
8.21k (x3.39)
TOTAL
10.64k
38.97k (x3.66)

Multithread

E5645

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.67k
9.19k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
35.47k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.31k
19.14k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
5.82k (x1.53)
TOTAL
50.7k
69.62k (x1.37)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5645
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.47k
12.9k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
4.4k
21.4k (x4.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.43k
10.73k (x4.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
8.16k (x3.5)
TOTAL
15.64k
53.19k (x3.4)

Multithread

E5645

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
34.43k
30.31k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
24.23k
45.13k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.48k
20.17k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
5.77k (x1.51)
TOTAL
76.96k
101.38k (x1.32)

Performance/W
E5645
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
430 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
303 points/W
1612 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
181 points/W
720 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
3621 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5645
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2311 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1573 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
867 points/GHz
2616 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
833 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
TOTAL
5584 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4