Xeon E5506 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 59.9 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.7 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 59.9 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.7 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
50657
Core
Gainestown
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4 /4
8/8
TDP
80 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2009
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
9.97k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.45k points
216.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5506
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1.21k
1.97k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
2.75k
8.15k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.37k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.78k
4.84k (x6.2)
TOTAL
6.68k
17.32k (x2.59)
Multithread
E5506
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
15.73k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
25.55k
64.78k (x2.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.1k
18.06k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.01k
5.21k (x1.04)
TOTAL
59.9k
103.77k (x1.73)
Performance/W
E5506
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
153 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
319 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
214 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
63 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
749 points/W
1221 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5506
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
565 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1291 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
910 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
366 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
3132 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4