| | | |

Xeon E5506 vs Pentium 4415U


Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5506 is 1.6 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
806e9
Core
Gainestown
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2009
January 2017

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5506
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1206
2339 (93.99%)
Test#2 (FP)
2754
9513 (245.45%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1941
3050 (57.17%)
Test#1 (Memory)
781
2585 (231.22%)
TOTAL
6681
17488 (161.76%)

Multithread

E5506

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
12246
4711 (-61.53%)
Test#2 (FP)
25545
21734 (-14.92%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17097
7346 (-57.04%)
Test#1 (Memory)
5008
2435 (-51.38%)
TOTAL
59896
36224 (-39.52%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5506
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
4477
8290 (85.16%)
Test#2 (FP)
2994
11823 (294.89%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1808
3092 (71.03%)
Test#1 (Memory)
692
4185 (504.28%)
TOTAL
9971
27389 (174.68%)

Multithread

E5506

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
41004
17238 (-57.96%)
Test#2 (FP)
28167
27398 (-2.73%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17399
7442 (-57.23%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3879
4312 (11.18%)
TOTAL
90449
56389 (-37.66%)

Performance/W
E5506
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
352 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
1131 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5506
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2099 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1404 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
4675 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8