Xeon E5506 vs Core 2 Duo E8400
Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 3.3 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 3.3 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
1067a
Core
Gainestown
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/2
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2009
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
9.97k points
17.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.45k points
27.11k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5506
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.21k
2.47k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
2.75k
6.74k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.87k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.78k
4.47k (x5.72)
TOTAL
6.68k
16.55k (x2.48)
Multithread
E5506
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
4.64k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
25.55k
12.36k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.1k
4.86k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.01k
1.96k (x0.39)
TOTAL
59.9k
23.82k (x0.4)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5506
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.48k
3.3k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
2.99k
7.28k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.81k
2.88k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
3.83k (x5.54)
TOTAL
9.97k
17.28k (x1.73)
Multithread
E5506
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
41k
6.3k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
13.71k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.4k
5.32k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
1.78k (x0.46)
TOTAL
90.45k
27.11k (x0.3)
Performance/W
E5506
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
352 points/W
211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
82 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
1131 points/W
417 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5506
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2099 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1404 points/GHz
2426 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
4675 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4