| | | | | | |

Xeon E5506 vs Core i7-720QM


Description
Both models E5506 and i7-720QM are based on Nehalem architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the i7-720QM gets 38.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.3 times faster than the i7-720QM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
106e5
Core
Gainestown
Clarksfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
80 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.97k points
13.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.45k points
38.78k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5506
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
1.21k
1.49k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
2.75k
3.4k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
1.95k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.78k
2.08k (x2.66)
TOTAL
6.68k
8.92k (x1.34)

Multithread

E5506

i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
4.23k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
25.55k
11.4k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.1k
7.17k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.01k
4.51k (x0.9)
TOTAL
59.9k
27.32k (x0.46)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5506
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
4.48k
5.49k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
2.99k
3.55k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.81k
2.01k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
2.09k (x3.01)
TOTAL
9.97k
13.13k (x1.32)

Multithread

E5506

i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
41k
15.06k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
12.15k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.4k
7.18k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
4.39k (x1.13)
TOTAL
90.45k
38.78k (x0.43)

Performance/W
E5506
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
335 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
352 points/W
270 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
160 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
1131 points/W
862 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5506
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
2099 points/GHz
1962 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1404 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
717 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
745 points/GHz
TOTAL
4675 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4