Xeon E5506 vs Celeron N4100
Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
706a1
Core
Gainestown
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
80 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
March 2009
December 2017
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5506
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
4477
4718 (5.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
2994
6993 (133.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1808
2694 (49.02%)
Test#1 (Memory)
692
2810 (305.72%)
TOTAL
9971
17214 (72.63%)
Multithread
E5506
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
41004
12541 (-69.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
28167
17994 (-36.12%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17399
6709 (-61.44%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3879
3328 (-14.19%)
TOTAL
90449
40572 (-55.14%)
Performance/W
E5506
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
352 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
1131 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5506
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
2099 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1404 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
4675 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8