Xeon E5506 vs Core i7-1195G7
Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 59.9 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 106.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.8 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 59.9 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 106.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.8 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
806c2
Core
Gainestown
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
80 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2009
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
9.97k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.45k points
239.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5506
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1.21k
4.57k (x3.79)
Test#2 (FP)
2.75k
17.21k (x6.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
9.97k (x5.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.78k
14.98k (x19.2)
TOTAL
6.68k
46.75k (x7)
Multithread
E5506
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
12.75k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
25.55k
45.98k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.1k
27.86k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.01k
20.06k (x4.01)
TOTAL
59.9k
106.66k (x1.78)
Performance/W
E5506
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
153 points/W
455 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
319 points/W
1642 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
214 points/W
995 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
63 points/W
717 points/W
TOTAL
749 points/W
3809 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5506
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
565 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1291 points/GHz
3443 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
910 points/GHz
1994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
366 points/GHz
2997 points/GHz
TOTAL
3132 points/GHz
9349 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4