| | | | | | |

Xeon E5506 vs Core i5-1135G7


Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 141.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.6 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
806c1
Core
Gainestown
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
80 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2009
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
9.97k points
68.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.45k points
237.55k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5506
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1.21k
3.75k (x3.11)
Test#2 (FP)
2.75k
17.28k (x6.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
9.5k (x4.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.78k
8.81k (x11.29)
TOTAL
6.68k
39.34k (x5.89)

Multithread

E5506

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
12.43k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25.55k
54.95k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.1k
26.41k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.01k
7.38k (x1.47)
TOTAL
59.9k
101.16k (x1.69)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5506
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.48k
13.43k (x3)
Test#2 (FP)
2.99k
22.29k (x7.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.81k
11.18k (x6.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
9.75k (x14.08)
TOTAL
9.97k
56.64k (x5.68)

Multithread

E5506

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
41k
40.24k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
65.99k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.4k
28.51k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
6.66k (x1.72)
TOTAL
90.45k
141.4k (x1.56)

Performance/W
E5506
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
352 points/W
2357 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
1018 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
238 points/W
TOTAL
1131 points/W
5050 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5506
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2099 points/GHz
3197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1404 points/GHz
5306 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
2661 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
2321 points/GHz
TOTAL
4675 points/GHz
13486 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4