Xeon E5504 vs Pentium N5000
Description
The E5504 is based on Nehalem architecture while the N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the N5000 gets 54.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.3 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the N5000 gets 54.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.3 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
706a1
Core
Gainestown
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
80 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2009
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
10.92k points
17.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.95k points
54.76k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5504
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
5.12k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
3.07k
7.66k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.85k
2.79k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
1.7k (x1.2)
TOTAL
10.92k
17.27k (x1.58)
Multithread
E5504
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
19.07k
17.56k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
12.52k
25.71k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
9.45k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
2.05k (x0.86)
TOTAL
41.95k
54.76k (x1.31)
Performance/W
E5504
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
238 points/W
2927 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
341 points/W
TOTAL
524 points/W
9127 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5504
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
2287 points/GHz
1895 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1535 points/GHz
2838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1032 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
713 points/GHz
631 points/GHz
TOTAL
5460 points/GHz
6396 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4