Xeon E5472 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 44.4 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.3 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 44.4 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.3 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
50657
Core
Harpertown
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
80 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
11264 kB
Date
November 2007
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
216.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
1.97k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
8.15k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
2.37k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
4.84k (x1.01)
TOTAL
15.39k
17.32k (x1.13)
Multithread
E5472
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
15.73k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
64.78k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
18.06k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
5.21k (x2.06)
TOTAL
44.38k
103.77k (x2.34)
Performance/W
E5472
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
113 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
289 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
555 points/W
1221 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5472
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
763 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1950 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
814 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1603 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
5129 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4