| | | | | | |

Xeon E5472 vs Core i7-860


Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the i7-860 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the i7-860 gets 75.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-860 is 1.6 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
106e5
Core
Harpertown
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
80 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2007
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
19.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
75.43k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
2.15k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
4.87k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
2.82k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
3.13k (x0.65)
TOTAL
15.39k
12.97k (x0.84)

Multithread

E5472

i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
8.24k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
21.63k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
14.65k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
5.02k (x1.99)
TOTAL
44.38k
49.54k (x1.12)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
7.87k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
5.25k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.94k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
3.13k (x0.65)
TOTAL
16.62k
19.19k (x1.15)

Multithread

E5472

i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
31.5k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
23.47k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
15.47k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
4.98k (x1.96)
TOTAL
48.62k
75.43k (x1.55)

Performance/W
E5472
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
332 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
247 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
163 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
52 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
794 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5472
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
2271 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
1514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
902 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
5534 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4