| | | | | | |

Xeon E5472 vs Core i5-5675R


Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the i5-5675R gets 151.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 3.1 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
40671
Core
Harpertown
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2007
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
4.14k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
14.35k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
4.94k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
5.47k (x1.14)
TOTAL
15.39k
28.91k (x1.88)

Multithread

E5472

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
16.02k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
54.6k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
18.69k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
16.87k (x6.67)
TOTAL
44.38k
106.18k (x2.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
12.86k (x4.46)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
16.85k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
5.19k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
5.49k (x1.14)
TOTAL
16.62k
40.39k (x2.43)

Multithread

E5472

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
50.07k (x4.48)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
64.61k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
19.84k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
17.09k (x6.72)
TOTAL
48.62k
151.6k (x3.12)

Performance/W
E5472
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
770 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
994 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
305 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
2332 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5472
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
3571 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
4682 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1442 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
1526 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
11220 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4