| | | | | | |

Xeon E5472 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.7 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
100fa0
Core
Harpertown
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
80 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2007
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
1.98k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
4.57k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
2.57k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
3.51k (x0.73)
TOTAL
15.39k
12.64k (x0.82)

Multithread

E5472

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
11.86k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
27.4k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
15.39k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
3.46k (x1.37)
TOTAL
44.38k
58.11k (x1.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
5.17k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
5.33k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.76k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
3.51k (x0.73)
TOTAL
16.62k
16.77k (x1.01)

Multithread

E5472

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
29.82k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
30.79k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
15.88k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
3.69k (x1.45)
TOTAL
48.62k
80.19k (x1.65)

Performance/W
E5472
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5472
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4