Xeon E5472 vs A6 9210
Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 1.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 1.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
670f00
Core
Harpertown
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
November 2007
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
4.87k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
10.38k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.59k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
2.38k (x0.49)
TOTAL
16.62k
20.22k (x1.22)
Multithread
E5472
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
7.41k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
11.87k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
3.35k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
2.6k (x1.02)
TOTAL
48.62k
25.23k (x0.52)
Performance/W
E5472
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5472
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4