| | | | | | |

Xeon E5472 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 2.1 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
806c1
Core
Harpertown
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
80 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2007
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
3.75k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
17.22k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
9.79k (x4.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
8.21k (x1.71)
TOTAL
15.39k
38.97k (x2.53)

Multithread

E5472

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
9.19k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
35.47k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
19.14k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
5.82k (x2.3)
TOTAL
44.38k
69.62k (x1.57)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
12.9k (x4.48)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
21.4k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
10.73k (x4.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
8.16k (x1.69)
TOTAL
16.62k
53.19k (x3.2)

Multithread

E5472

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
30.31k (x2.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
45.13k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
20.17k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
5.77k (x2.27)
TOTAL
48.62k
101.38k (x2.09)

Performance/W
E5472
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
1612 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
720 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
3621 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5472
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
2616 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4