Xeon E5-4640 vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 581.6 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 26.4 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 581.6 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 26.4 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
10676
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2012
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-4640
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
6.19k
2.88k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
5.89k
6.31k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.11k
2.53k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.51k
1.35k (x0.54)
TOTAL
16.7k
13.08k (x0.78)
Multithread
E5-4640
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
244.88k
5.45k (x0.02)
Test#2 (FP)
215.35k
11.5k (x0.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.64k
4.02k (x0.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
1.05k (x0.16)
TOTAL
581.63k
22.02k (x0.04)
Performance/W
E5-4640
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2578 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2267 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1207 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
6122 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-4640
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2210 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2105 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
895 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
5966 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4