Xeon E5-4640 vs Core i9-10900K
Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 581.6 k points while the i9-10900K gets 608.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1 times faster than the E5-4640 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 581.6 k points while the i9-10900K gets 608.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1 times faster than the E5-4640 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
a0655
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8 /16
10/20
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
685.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-4640
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6.19k
19.5k (x3.15)
Test#2 (FP)
5.89k
28.01k (x4.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.11k
7.45k (x3.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.51k
15.82k (x6.31)
TOTAL
16.7k
70.79k (x4.24)
Multithread
E5-4640
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
244.88k
194.49k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
215.35k
312.59k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.64k
89.14k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
12.58k (x1.86)
TOTAL
581.63k
608.81k (x1.05)
Performance/W
E5-4640
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2578 points/W
1556 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2267 points/W
2501 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1207 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
6122 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-4640
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2210 points/GHz
3751 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2105 points/GHz
5387 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
1433 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
895 points/GHz
3043 points/GHz
TOTAL
5966 points/GHz
13614 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4