| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-4640 vs Core i5-10500


Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the i5-10500 gets 297.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 2 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
a0653
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8 /16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
387.99k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-4640
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.66k
4.52k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
18.52k (x3.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.13k
5.58k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
14.2k (x5.61)
TOTAL
11.58k
42.82k (x3.7)

Multithread

E5-4640

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
77.64k
25.26k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
212.2k
120.48k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.11k
38.12k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
7.68k (x1.02)
TOTAL
410.48k
191.54k (x0.47)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-4640
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
6.19k
16.3k (x2.63)
Test#2 (FP)
5.89k
23.22k (x3.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.11k
6.22k (x2.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.51k
14.05k (x5.6)
TOTAL
16.7k
59.79k (x3.58)

Multithread

E5-4640

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
244.88k
92.61k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
215.35k
147.68k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.64k
40.71k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
7.78k (x1.15)
TOTAL
581.63k
288.77k (x0.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-4640
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
5.01k
16.33k (x3.26)
Test#2 (FP)
4.5k
24.73k (x5.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
5.99k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.19k
13.64k (x6.23)
TOTAL
13.88k
60.69k (x4.37)

Multithread

E5-4640

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
251.29k
91.64k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
236.61k
158.71k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.89k
39.84k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.36k
7.76k (x1.05)
TOTAL
610.16k
297.94k (x0.49)

Performance/W
E5-4640
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
2645 points/W
1410 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/W
2442 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1209 points/W
613 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
6423 points/W
4584 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-4640
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
1790 points/GHz
3629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1609 points/GHz
5496 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
777 points/GHz
1332 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
782 points/GHz
3031 points/GHz
TOTAL
4957 points/GHz
13487 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4