| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-4640 vs Core i3-540


Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-540 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 581.6 k points while the i3-540 gets 38.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 15 times faster than the i3-540 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
20655
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Clarkdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2/2
TDP
95 W
73 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2012
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
18.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
38.86k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-4640
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
6.19k
7.65k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
5.89k
5.14k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.11k
3.06k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.51k
2.42k (x0.97)
TOTAL
16.7k
18.27k (x1.09)

Multithread

E5-4640

i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
244.88k
16.21k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
215.35k
12.04k (x0.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.64k
8.28k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
2.33k (x0.34)
TOTAL
581.63k
38.86k (x0.07)

Performance/W
E5-4640
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
2578 points/W
222 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2267 points/W
165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1207 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
6122 points/W
532 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-4640
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
2210 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2105 points/GHz
1676 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
999 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
895 points/GHz
789 points/GHz
TOTAL
5966 points/GHz
5958 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4