Xeon E5-4640 vs Celeron 4205U
Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 581.6 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 15.5 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 581.6 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 15.5 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
806ec
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2/2
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2048 kB
Date
May 2012
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
20.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
37.61k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-4640
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.19k
6.53k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
5.89k
9.46k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.11k
2.28k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.51k
2.34k (x0.93)
TOTAL
16.7k
20.61k (x1.23)
Multithread
E5-4640
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
244.88k
12.97k (x0.05)
Test#2 (FP)
215.35k
18.12k (x0.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.64k
4.33k (x0.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
2.18k (x0.32)
TOTAL
581.63k
37.61k (x0.06)
Performance/W
E5-4640
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
2578 points/W
865 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2267 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1207 points/W
289 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
146 points/W
TOTAL
6122 points/W
2507 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-4640
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
2210 points/GHz
3629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2105 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
895 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
TOTAL
5966 points/GHz
11451 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4