| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-4640 vs Ryzen 9 7950X


Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 7950X is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 7950X gets 1330.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.2 times faster than the E5-4640 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
a60f12
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Raphael
Architecture
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM5
Cores/Threads
8 /16
16/32
TDP
95 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
131072 kB
Date
May 2012
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
1597.79k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-4640
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1.66k
6.05k (x3.64)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
23.41k (x4.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.13k
16.49k (x7.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
34.35k (x13.58)
TOTAL
11.58k
80.3k (x6.93)

Multithread

E5-4640

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
77.64k
128.82k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
212.2k
465.79k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.11k
289.43k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
75.23k (x9.97)
TOTAL
410.48k
959.27k (x2.34)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-4640
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5.01k
26.86k (x5.36)
Test#2 (FP)
4.5k
30.05k (x6.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
16.15k (x7.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.19k
31.74k (x14.5)
TOTAL
13.88k
104.8k (x7.55)

Multithread

E5-4640

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
251.29k
430.6k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
236.61k
545.91k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.89k
289.57k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.36k
64.33k (x8.74)
TOTAL
610.16k
1330.41k (x2.18)

Performance/W
E5-4640
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
2645 points/W
2533 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/W
3211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1209 points/W
1703 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
378 points/W
TOTAL
6423 points/W
7826 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-4640
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1790 points/GHz
4712 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1609 points/GHz
5272 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
777 points/GHz
2834 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
782 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
TOTAL
4957 points/GHz
18386 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4