Xeon E5-4640 vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 3900 gets 620.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1 times faster than the E5-4640 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 3900 gets 620.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1 times faster than the E5-4640 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
870f10
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
8 /16
12/24
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
May 2012
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
687.5k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-4640
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
1.66k
4.39k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
16.99k (x3.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.13k
7.74k (x3.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
24.57k (x9.71)
TOTAL
11.58k
53.69k (x4.63)
Multithread
E5-4640
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
77.64k
48.45k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
212.2k
230.81k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.11k
122.82k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
54.73k (x7.26)
TOTAL
410.48k
456.8k (x1.11)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-4640
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6.19k
16.59k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
5.89k
24.55k (x4.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.11k
8.55k (x4.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.51k
26.28k (x10.48)
TOTAL
16.7k
75.97k (x4.55)
Multithread
E5-4640
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
244.88k
181.33k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
215.35k
261.01k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.64k
126.62k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
66.64k (x9.86)
TOTAL
581.63k
635.6k (x1.09)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-4640
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
5.01k
16.16k (x3.22)
Test#2 (FP)
4.5k
23.75k (x5.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
9.32k (x4.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.19k
23.17k (x10.59)
TOTAL
13.88k
72.4k (x5.22)
Multithread
E5-4640
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
251.29k
174.73k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
236.61k
275.63k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.89k
125.65k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.36k
44.17k (x6)
TOTAL
610.16k
620.18k (x1.02)
Performance/W
E5-4640
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
2645 points/W
2688 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1209 points/W
1933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
680 points/W
TOTAL
6423 points/W
9541 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-4640
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
1790 points/GHz
3758 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1609 points/GHz
5524 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
777 points/GHz
2167 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
782 points/GHz
5388 points/GHz
TOTAL
4957 points/GHz
16838 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4