Xeon E5-4640 vs Ryzen 7 5700X
Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 5700X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 410.5 k points while the 5700X gets 304.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 1.3 times faster than the 5700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 410.5 k points while the 5700X gets 304.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 1.3 times faster than the 5700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
a20f12
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
8 /16
8/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
32768 kB
Date
May 2012
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
85.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
517.51k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-4640
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1.66k
4.82k (x2.9)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
19.73k (x3.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.13k
11.69k (x5.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
27.52k (x10.87)
TOTAL
11.58k
63.75k (x5.5)
Multithread
E5-4640
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
77.64k
32.8k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
212.2k
161.17k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.11k
98k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
12.92k (x1.71)
TOTAL
410.48k
304.88k (x0.74)
Performance/W
E5-4640
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
817 points/W
505 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2234 points/W
2479 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
4690 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-4640
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1879 points/GHz
4288 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
760 points/GHz
2542 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
904 points/GHz
5982 points/GHz
TOTAL
4137 points/GHz
13859 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4