Xeon E5-4640 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 3.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 3.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
810f81
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/4
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2012
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-4640
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1.66k
3.89k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
17.94k (x3.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.13k
5.34k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
6.62k (x2.61)
TOTAL
11.58k
33.79k (x2.92)
Multithread
E5-4640
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
77.64k
15.07k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
212.2k
66.84k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.11k
19.56k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
6.54k (x0.87)
TOTAL
410.48k
108.01k (x0.26)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-4640
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6.19k
14.3k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
5.89k
21.69k (x3.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.11k
5.42k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.51k
6.6k (x2.63)
TOTAL
16.7k
48k (x2.87)
Multithread
E5-4640
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
244.88k
55.45k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
215.35k
83.13k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.64k
20.76k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
6.58k (x0.97)
TOTAL
581.63k
165.91k (x0.29)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-4640
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5.01k
13.05k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
4.5k
22.88k (x5.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
5.39k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.19k
7.31k (x3.34)
TOTAL
13.88k
48.63k (x3.5)
Multithread
E5-4640
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
251.29k
51.73k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
236.61k
87.74k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.89k
20.74k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.36k
6.57k (x0.89)
TOTAL
610.16k
166.79k (x0.27)
Performance/W
E5-4640
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2645 points/W
796 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/W
1350 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1209 points/W
319 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
6423 points/W
2566 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-4640
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1790 points/GHz
3262 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1609 points/GHz
5719 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
777 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
782 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
4957 points/GHz
12157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4