Xeon E5-4640 vs Athlon 5150 APU
Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 5150 APU is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 20.3 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 20.3 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
700f01
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Kabini
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM1
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/4
TDP
95 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
256 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2012
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
30.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-4640
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
5.01k
3.02k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
4.5k
2.62k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
1.59k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.19k
1.02k (x0.47)
TOTAL
13.88k
8.26k (x0.6)
Multithread
E5-4640
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
251.29k
12.06k (x0.05)
Test#2 (FP)
236.61k
10.42k (x0.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.89k
6.32k (x0.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.36k
1.26k (x0.17)
TOTAL
610.16k
30.06k (x0.05)
Performance/W
E5-4640
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
2645 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1209 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
6423 points/W
1203 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-4640
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
1790 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1609 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
777 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
782 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
4957 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4