| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-4640 vs A6 7400K


Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 7400K is based on Steamroller.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 7400K gets 34.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 17.8 times faster than the 7400K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
630f01
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Kaveri
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket FM2+
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2012
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
34.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-4640
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
5.01k
8.78k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
4.5k
9.45k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
3.39k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.19k
2.39k (x1.09)
TOTAL
13.88k
24.01k (x1.73)

Multithread

E5-4640

7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
251.29k
13.5k (x0.05)
Test#2 (FP)
236.61k
12.17k (x0.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.89k
5.96k (x0.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.36k
2.65k (x0.36)
TOTAL
610.16k
34.28k (x0.06)

Performance/W
E5-4640
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
2645 points/W
208 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/W
187 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1209 points/W
92 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
6423 points/W
527 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-4640
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
1790 points/GHz
2252 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1609 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
777 points/GHz
869 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
782 points/GHz
612 points/GHz
TOTAL
4957 points/GHz
6156 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4