Xeon E5-4640 vs A6 7310
Description
The E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 7310 is based on Puma.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 17 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-4640 gets a score of 610.2 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 17 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
730f01
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Carrizo-L
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
FP4
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/4
TDP
95 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
kB
Date
May 2012
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
13.88k points
11.17k points
Mean multithread perf.
610.16k points
35.87k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-4640
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
5.01k
4.08k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
4.5k
3.76k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
2.21k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.19k
1.12k (x0.51)
TOTAL
13.88k
11.17k (x0.8)
Multithread
E5-4640
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
251.29k
13.38k (x0.05)
Test#2 (FP)
236.61k
13.51k (x0.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.89k
7.39k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.36k
1.59k (x0.22)
TOTAL
610.16k
35.87k (x0.06)
Performance/W
E5-4640
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
2645 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/W
540 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1209 points/W
296 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
6423 points/W
1435 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-4640
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
1790 points/GHz
1700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1609 points/GHz
1566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
777 points/GHz
921 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
782 points/GHz
467 points/GHz
TOTAL
4957 points/GHz
4654 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4