Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 24.3 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 24.3 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
10676
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
12 /24
2/2
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
3k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
6.62k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
2.55k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
3.6k (x1)
TOTAL
27.91k
15.77k (x0.56)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
5.83k (x0.02)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
12.64k (x0.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
4.97k (x0.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
1.95k (x0.18)
TOTAL
617.84k
25.39k (x0.04)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1944 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1836 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
888 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
4753 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
3041 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2722 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
7973 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4