Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core m7-6Y75
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 11.8 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 11.8 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
12 /24
2/4
TDP
130 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
10.24k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
15.33k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
2.97k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
5.32k (x1.56)
TOTAL
27.92k
33.86k (x1.21)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
16.78k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
25.09k (x0.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
6.14k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
5.58k (x0.52)
TOTAL
633.14k
53.58k (x0.08)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4