Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i7-6700HQ
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i7-6700HQ gets 145.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 4.3 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i7-6700HQ gets 145.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 4.3 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Skylake-H
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4/8
TDP
130 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
50.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
205.24k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
11.23k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
16.98k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
4.21k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
7.07k (x2.08)
TOTAL
27.92k
39.49k (x1.41)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
44.59k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
75.02k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
20.15k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
5.92k (x0.56)
TOTAL
633.14k
145.68k (x0.23)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
991 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
1667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
3237 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
3208 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
4853 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
2021 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
11284 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4